Reflections, impact and recommendations of a co-produced ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study with young people who have experience of suicidality and psychiatric inpatient care

Introduction Patient and public involvement (PPI) in suicide research is ethical, moral can deliver impact. However, inconsistent reporting of meaningful PPI, hesitancy sharing power with people experience suicidality (i.e.co-researchers) makes it difficult to understand the full potential impact PPI on research, researchers co-researchers. Objectives To describe how our ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study, examining sleep-suicide relationship young psychiatric inpatients (aged 18-35) transitioning community, has been co-produced, whilst reflecting impact, challenges, recommendations. Methods We built co-produced mental health conduct study. Young adults inpatient care were appointed November 2020 work across all stages. Reflections recommendations have collected throughout. Results Three became Researcher co-researcher reflections indicated establishing maintaining safe environments for open discussion, continued communication (e.g.WhatsApp group) vital effectively share decision making. Safeguarding support requirements both co-researchers (e.g.individualised strategy) researcher (e.g.clinical supervision) particularly evident. date, recruitment poster, documentation, article demonstrated significant Conclusions This first EMA study focused suicide-sleep during transitions be suicidality. Co-producing intensive, time-consuming, challenging but a researchers, expect learning will directly influence, help others produce, research. Disclosure No relationships.